<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tell AT&amp;T Where Coverage is Poor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/tell-att-where-coverage-is-poor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/tell-att-where-coverage-is-poor/</link>
	<description>HTPC, Gadgets, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/tell-att-where-coverage-is-poor/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/?p=1581#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused by AT&amp;T&#039;s current advertising mission as well. Verizon advertises that they have more 3G coverage than AT&amp;T. AT&amp;T counters with ads that talk about where they have cellular service. Verizon never said that AT&amp;T didn&#039;t cellular service in a lot of places, they were talking about 3G, which I don&#039;t have/use, but I&#039;m still acutely aware of the difference. 

The AT&amp;T ads are even more stupid because he sits there throwing those post cards and rattling off cities and I&#039;m supposed to be impressed that AT&amp;T has cellular service in remote places like, oh, Chicago, Philadelphia, Denver, and New York.  That&#039;s some comprehensive coverage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by AT&amp;T&#8217;s current advertising mission as well. Verizon advertises that they have more 3G coverage than AT&amp;T. AT&amp;T counters with ads that talk about where they have cellular service. Verizon never said that AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t cellular service in a lot of places, they were talking about 3G, which I don&#8217;t have/use, but I&#8217;m still acutely aware of the difference. </p>
<p>The AT&amp;T ads are even more stupid because he sits there throwing those post cards and rattling off cities and I&#8217;m supposed to be impressed that AT&amp;T has cellular service in remote places like, oh, Chicago, Philadelphia, Denver, and New York.  That&#8217;s some comprehensive coverage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

