<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Multimedia-PCs &#187; AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/category/amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com</link>
	<description>HTPC, Gadgets, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Build a $300 computer: Intel or AMD?</title>
		<link>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/build-a-300-computer-intel-or-amd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/build-a-300-computer-intel-or-amd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia pcs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremywjones.com/projects/multimedia-pcs/wordpress/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/19/the-300-pc/ Tom&#8217;s hardware did a post on building a $300 computer. The catch is they compared an AMD system vs. an Intel system. I was really surprised with the results. The Intel Celeron outperformed the AMD sempron. I was really interested in buying the Sempron for a basic machine that would be low on power [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/19/the-300-pc/">http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/19/the-300-pc/</a></p>
<p>Tom&#8217;s hardware did a post on building a $300 computer.  The catch is they compared an AMD system vs. an Intel system.  I was really surprised with the results.  The Intel Celeron outperformed the AMD sempron.  I was really interested in buying the Sempron for a basic machine that would be low on power consumption.  Looks like I should reconsider the Celeron.  If your in the market for building a cheap computer head over there and check it out.</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Random Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/xbox-360-iptv-coming/" title="xbox 360 IPTV coming">xbox 360 IPTV coming</a></li><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/video-dell-netbooktablet-hybrid/" title="Video: Dell Netbook/Tablet Hybrid">Video: Dell Netbook/Tablet Hybrid</a></li><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/firefox-3-6-works-with-accelerometer/" title="Firefox 3.6 Works with Accelerometer">Firefox 3.6 Works with Accelerometer</a></li><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/windows-home-server-power-pack-2-with-media-center-integration/" title="Windows Home Server Power Pack 2 with Media Center Integration">Windows Home Server Power Pack 2 with Media Center Integration</a></li><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/windows-home-server-part-1/" title="Windows Home Server: Part 1">Windows Home Server: Part 1</a></li><li><a href="http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/deal-philips-universal-remote-under-8/" title="Deal: Philips Universal Remote Under $8">Deal: Philips Universal Remote Under $8</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.multimedia-pcs.com/build-a-300-computer-intel-or-amd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

